I would like to ask how your campaign can have any hope of being seen as in any way credible in international law, if it is so full of historical inaccuracies and a laughable grip on any form of legal context.
I can only assume that it is meant as at best a joke or at worst a
stupid hoax.
It may of course be that it is I who have missunderstood all my readings of history and your amazing claims are valid.
KMD